Kim Kardashian’s “Hairy Underwear” Sparks Outrage — and a Deeper Look Into the Media Machine Now Facing $10 Billion Judgment

A PR Nightmare—or a Masterpiece in Manipulation?

By Grady Owen | REAL TALK Investigations
St. John’s • London • Los Angeles • New York — October 2025

I. From Viral Stunt to Evidence Exhibit

Kim Kardashian’s latest “hairy underwear” campaign went viral for all the wrong reasons—mocked by fashion critics and condemned by fans as exploitative click-bait.

But inside new Antigua & Barbuda sovereign filings—ECSC No. ANUHCV 2025/0149—such stunts are cited not as marketing accidents, but as part of an orchestrated distraction economy run by a handful of inter-locked media conglomerates now under judicial scrutiny.

According to witness declarations reviewed by Shockya, Kardashian-linked publicity cycles were repeatedly used to divert attention from ongoing litigation involving CBS Interactive, Paramount Global, and their affiliates. The filings suggest a “pattern of synthetic scandal,” designed to dominate online trends while lawsuits over human trafficking, RICO, and data exploitation quietly unfolded in the background.

“These weren’t accidents,” one declaration reads. “They were scheduled distractions—rolled out whenever court filings hit the wire.”

II. $10 Billion Default Judgment and Global Exposure

On October 17 the Eastern Caribbean Supreme Court entered a $10 billion default judgment in Antigua & Barbuda v. The Media Cartel.
The pleadings connect executives and investors spanning Paramount Global, National Amusements (Redstone family), BlackRock, Vanguard, Disney, Comcast, and Fox.
While no criminal liability has yet been adjudicated, the filings cite possible exposure under:

• 18 U.S.C. § 1962 (RICO)
• 18 U.S.C. § 2252A (child-exploitation materials)
• 18 U.S.C. § 1343 (Wire Fraud)
• U.K. Serious Crime Act 2007 / Computer Misuse Act 1990

Prime Minister Gaston Browne has publicly endorsed sovereign enforcement as part of Antigua’s wider reparations and governance initiative presented at the UN.

III. The Victims Identified in the Court Record

Court materials and attached exhibits detail sworn testimony from multiple survivors whose cases were allegedly suppressed or mishandled within the same media-legal ecosystem now under review.

Each declaration remains under judicial review and subject to due process; no criminal verdict has yet been entered.

IV. Why This Matters

The juxtaposition is stark: while headlines focus on Kardashian’s surreal lingerie stunt, international courts are weighing evidence that could redefine the limits of media accountability.
The Antigua judgment—if recognized in the U.K. or U.S.—would mark the first successful sovereign enforcement action against a Western media conglomerate for alleged systemic misconduct.

For investors and institutions, this shifts ESG and disclosure risk from optics to operational liability: the question is no longer what brands look like online, but what their internal documents reveal under oath.

V. Transparency & Legal Notice

This article summarizes allegations drawn from filed court records in ECSC No. ANUHCV 2025/0149.
Default judgments determine liability when parties fail to appear; they are not criminal convictions.
All individuals and entities named retain the presumption of innocence unless and until courts issue final findings after due process.

© 2025 Shockya — REAL TALK Investigations • Public-Interest Documentation Project
Download source exhibits and the ANU-COURT-CaseInfo-5 registry export at Shockya.com/news