Investor Alert
The Antigua & Barbuda sovereign filings reference major institutional investors whose positions in
Paramount Global and associated entities may carry disclosure and governance exposure if the allegations
are upheld. These investors include:
- National Amusements (Redstone family)
- BlackRock, Vanguard, and State Street
- Clal Insurance and Bank Hapoalim (Israel)
- Gideon Tadmor and Sipur Holdings
- Comcast / NBCUniversal interests
- Disney / Fox / Murdoch / Roberts family shareholdings
Per the filings, these names appear in connection with ownership and merger disclosures;
no criminal liability has been adjudicated. Investors are advised to review the
EXHIBIT PGLOB – Paramount Global Investor Brief (PDF)
and the ANU Court Casefile Data Dump
for complete details.
Disclosure Reminder: Institutions should evaluate ESG, compliance, and litigation-finance exposure
arising from the pending Antigua & Barbuda v. Media Cartel proceedings (ECSC ANUHCV 2025/0149).
REAL TALK • Shockya Investigations
Views: — • Last updated: Oct 17, 2025
By Shockya Investigations — St. John’s • London • New York — October 2025
This report summarizes what is alleged in filed court documents before the Eastern Caribbean Supreme Court in
Antigua & Barbuda v. The Media Cartel (ECSC No. ANUHCV 2025/0149) and related records. According to those filings,
the Court has entered a $10 billion default judgment against certain named defendants after failures to appear.
The filings further cite U.S. and U.K. criminal statutes that could be implicated if the factual allegations are judicially verified.
I. Sovereign Case Overview
The Antigua proceeding consolidates evidence and declarations spanning the United States and the United Kingdom. The record
includes sworn witness statements and exhibits, service confirmations on multiple parties, and motions seeking recognition
and enforcement across jurisdictions. Filings reviewed by Shockya indicate personal service on executives in
London (May 17, 2025) and New York (May 18, 2025), followed by default entries and a consolidated judgment request.
II. $10 Billion Default Judgment (Per Court Record)

As reflected in the filings, the Eastern Caribbean Supreme Court has entered a default judgment valued at $10,000,000,000 USD
against certain named defendants. The Consolidated Judgment Motion (PDF)
seeks recognition and cross-border enforcement. Default judgments determine liability procedurally where parties do not appear; they are not criminal convictions.
III. Statutes Cited in the Filings (Potential Exposure If Allegations Are Proven)
The Antigua court materials cite several statutes that could be implicated if the underlying facts are adopted by a trier of fact. The Shockya summary below
is based on the language and citations contained in the filed record:
- 18 U.S.C. § 1962 (RICO): Racketeering conspiracy provisions referenced in the pleadings.
- 18 U.S.C. § 2252A: Provisions relating to the distribution/transportation of prohibited sexual-abuse material, discussed in connection with historical P2P ecosystems.
- 18 U.S.C. § 1343 (Wire Fraud) & 18 U.S.C. § 1503 (Obstruction of Justice): Identified in the filings as potential predicates if specific conduct is proven.
- U.K. Serious Crime Act 2007 & Computer Misuse Act 1990: British statutory context cited where relevant to acts alleged to have occurred in the U.K.
Editor’s note: These references appear in court documents; ultimate applicability depends on judicial findings and due process.
IV. Antigua’s Sovereign Support & UN Context

Public statements appended to the filings and related media show that the Government of Antigua & Barbuda supports the court process as part of a broader
reparations and governance initiative. The video above is included in the record to evidence the government’s position on sovereign enforcement.
V. Investor Risk & Disclosure (Per Exhibits)
The filings include an investor-structure brief (EXHIBIT PGLOB – Paramount Global Investor Brief)
summarizing ownership and governance following merger activity. While no criminal liability has been adjudicated against investors, the materials note
potential disclosure and governance exposure if the allegations are later verified by a court. The dossier urges institutional stakeholders to review
the public record and pending motions for enforcement.
VI. Digital Context Referenced in the Record

Court submissions discuss historic peer-to-peer software ecosystems and editorial/hosting practices described in older media-industry coverage.
The relevance and legal effect of those materials are questions before the courts, as outlined in the filings.
VII. The Evidence Record — Official Data & Exhibits
ANU COURT MASTER CASEFILE — DATA DUMP (Official Registry Export)
Eastern Caribbean Supreme Court • Antigua & Barbuda — ECSC Case No. ANUHCV 2025/0149
Key Exhibits (Public Copies)
Exhibit Snapshots — Public Filings Overview
Summaries of exhibits referenced in sovereign and U.S. case filings (as filed).
Civil complaint introducing principal allegations and timeline incorporated by reference in the sovereign record.
Download PDF
Sworn statement describing contemporaneous conversations and reported distress; supports chronology.
Download PDF
Witness account of alleged coercion and communications among industry figures; provides linkage within timeline.
Download PDF
Anonymous declaration describing assaults; identities sealed by the court; offered as pattern evidence.
Download PDF
Affidavit describing injuries and digital-media items later provided to investigators, per filing.
Download PDF
Pre-sovereign complaint that establishes early chronology and venue links referenced by later filings.
Download PDF
Technical-witness declaration describing events at a private residence and alleged intoxication, offered to show modus operandi.
Download PDF
Corporate correspondence record cited for governance context and knowledge in the pleadings.
Download PDF
Ownership and governance summary; referenced for investor disclosure analysis within the filings.
Download PDF
VIII. Transparency & Legal Notice
This article summarizes what is alleged in filed court documents and references a $10 billion default judgment as reflected in the court record.
Default judgments are procedural determinations entered when parties do not appear; they are not criminal convictions. All persons and entities named in the filings
retain the presumption of innocence unless and until a court enters final findings after due process.
